Menu
Joint ventures often involve parties who otherwise operate independent, sometimes competing, businesses — brought together around a single project or opportunity. That added complexity makes a clear exit strategy even more important than in a standard partnership. When the venture involves separate corporate entities, differing capital contributions, or a defined project timeline, the question of “what happens if someone wants out” becomes more complicated, not less.
A joint venture can be destabilized quickly if one partner faces a change in circumstances — a change in ownership at their parent company, a shift in strategic priorities, financial distress, or simply a disagreement over the venture's direction. Without a buy-sell agreement, there's no pre-agreed mechanism for resolving that disruption, which can leave the entire venture in limbo or force a costly, contentious dissolution.
A well-drafted buy-sell agreement for a joint venture specifies how the venture's value — and each party's interest in it — will be determined at the time of exit, along with the triggering events that permit a buyout (breach, insolvency, change of control, or simply an agreed-upon exit window). This keeps the process businesslike rather than adversarial.
Just as with a traditional partnership, an unaddressed exit can result in a JV interest passing to a party never contemplated by the original agreement — a creditor, a successor company after a merger, or an heir. A buy-sell agreement with appropriate transfer restrictions and rights of first refusal keeps ownership of the venture within the hands of the parties who negotiated it.
Before you finalize a joint venture agreement, make sure it includes a clear, enforceable buy-sell provision. Oberman Law Firm's Business & Transactional Practice Group can help you structure the exit terms before the venture even begins — contact us to discuss your joint venture agreement.
Privacy Policy | View Our Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Client Services
© 2026 Oberman Law Firm