Menu
Across the country, businesses are increasingly facing lawsuits filed by so-called “testers”—individuals who visit properties or websites not as customers, but to identify alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). These plaintiffs then file accessibility lawsuits, often in bulk, claiming that the business has failed to comply with ADA standards.
While many ADA claims promote accessibility and inclusion, others appear designed primarily to generate attorney fees or quick settlements. Understanding your rights and responsibilities is essential if your business is targeted by a “tester” claim.
A “tester” is someone who visits a property or business location for the sole purpose of checking ADA compliance, rather than purchasing goods or services.
If a tester identifies what they believe to be a violation—such as inaccessible parking, improper signage, or a noncompliant website—they may file a lawsuit under Title III of the ADA, which governs public accommodations.
Although federal ADA claims generally allow only injunctive relief (an order to fix the violation) and attorneys’ fees, and many states have companion laws permitting monetary damages, which has fueled a wave of serial litigation.
The courts remain divided on whether testers have the legal right (“standing”) to sue businesses they never intended to patronize.
In 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court considered Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer, a case involving a tester who sued hotels for allegedly inaccessible websites despite having no intent to stay at them. Although the Court dismissed the case, several Justices suggested a willingness to revisit whether testers have standing under the ADA.
Until clearer guidance emerges, businesses may continue to face these claims—especially in jurisdictions historically favorable to tester lawsuits.
Whether or not a tester’s claim seems legitimate, all businesses open to the public have a legal obligation to ensure ADA compliance. This includes:
Failure to meet these standards—even unintentionally—can lead to lawsuits, remediation costs, and attorney fees.
Engage an accessibility consultant or legal professional to review your property and website for potential violations before a tester does.
Keep detailed records of inspections, repairs, and upgrades. Documentation can demonstrate good-faith compliance and reduce liability.
Staff should understand ADA basics and know how to assist individuals with disabilities appropriately.
Contact legal counsel immediately upon receiving a demand letter or complaint. Avoid making admissions or settlements without review. An attorney can assess whether the plaintiff has standing and evaluate defense options.
Tester lawsuits tend to cluster in certain jurisdictions. Awareness helps your business allocate compliance resources effectively.
Even if a lawsuit appears opportunistic, accessibility compliance is non-negotiable under the ADA. Proactive compliance measures not only minimize legal exposure but also strengthen your business’s reputation for inclusion and customer care.
Oberman Law Firm assists businesses with ADA compliance reviews, defense against accessibility claims, and strategic risk management planning. If your business receives a tester-related demand or lawsuit, or if you would like to schedule a preventative compliance audit, our attorneys are here to help.
Privacy Policy | View Our Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Client Services
© 2026 Oberman Law Firm